The anti ASEA Campaign

The contents of this page is a personal view and does not represent the opinion and view of ASEA the company and may not represent the views of other ASEA Associates.


FOR A TREATMENT TO BE LISTED AS A DRUG BY A NATIONAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION BODY AND BE REQUIRED TO BE PRESCRIBED BY A MEDICAL PRACTITIONER IT MUST HAVE BEEN TESTED AND FOUND TO HAVE A LETHAL DOSAGE LEVEL CALLED LD50 – THE DOSE REQUIRED TO KILL HALF THE MEMBERS OF A TESTED POPULATION AFTER A SPECIFIED TEST DURATION.

DRUG COMPANIES ARE IN THE DRUG BUSINESS SO NON-TOXIC TREATMENTS THAT ARE FREELY AVAILABLE OR PATENTS HELD BY NON DRUG COMPANY COMPETITORS MAY REPRESENT A THREAT TO THE DRUG COMPANY BUSINESS MODEL – AS MIGHT A FULL CURE FOR ANY CHRONIC MEDICAL CONDITION.


Right Thinking
It would very be surprising if you had no doubts or questions whatsoever when you were first told about ASEA products. Right thinking people are well informed, have a healthy degree of skepticism when it comes to things that are new and will seek to validate or refute to their current satisfaction. I have worked in the internet all my life and I have found that whatever view you hold or support; however extreme or moderate, you will find something on the internet to confirm your position. Just remember that Google is called a search engine not a research engine.

Due Dilligence
When you first start to do your due diligence on ASEA and their products you will probably search to see what’s being said by others. You will very quickly came across several forum type websites that appear to focus on and aggressively negate products (not ideas or concepts mind you but branded products) that would fit into the category of things that might be called “disruptive technology”. In this case we are referring to technology that is disruptive to the pharmaceutical industry. If you are still wondering what I mean just go back to my statement at the top of this page.

The Detractors
These sites are quite clever in their approach – they usually start out with someone ‘new’ to ASEA  asking for an opinion about the products or business. What follows is a long string of strongly worded responses posted by what seem to be ‘lots’ of ‘concerned’ people posting their negative comments and opinions. In many cases the responses are personally abusive towards the questioners in the vein of “how f–king stupid you must be to even consider using such a useless product you stupid moron” and similar.

Disrupting Established Paradigms
You might wonder why other people would be so singularly aggressive and negative about these kinds of things. What’s their motivation? I can understand if someone had had a bad experience with a product or business however you will find it very difficult to find anyone who can say in truth that they had a bad experience with the ASEA products or the company – in fact the opposite is true for most and especially after using the products for 3 months plus. This is a technology and products that look like disrupting some established paradigms in wellness. So – what would someone’s motivation be to attack or respond negatively and campaign in such a focused way to people searching for answers?

Redox Signalling
Imagine a technology that is being studied so heavily that when you go to a government website like pubmed.gov (the extensive depository for the US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health peer-reviewed medical research) you can search for “redox signaling” and find over 12,575 article listings at the time of writing and rising every day.

Fast Growing Research Field
Imagine that this area of study and technology is one of the fasting growing areas of medical research today and that many bio-tech and drug companies are doing research into the field of Redox Signalling at this time and are looking for ways to commercialise the technology without breaching existing patents.

Patented technology
Imagine on one hand that one company holds the patents for the stabilisation of Redox Signalling Molecules (no patent has ever been issued for salt water)

5 Years and 5 Million dollars
Imagine spending several years and millions of dollars in an attempt to get FDA approval for the product so it can be prescribed as a medicine and failing to gain this because the product turns out to have zero toxicity and therefore cannot receive a LD50 rating.

Big Offer From Big Pharma
Imagine that this company has been approached and received at least one substantial offer from a major pharmaceutical company and that the offer was certainly high enough to accept (think billions not millions) but carried a caveat, an absolute condition to close the deal, that the company must immediately cease and desist all testing and that all product be immediately taken back from test users.

Unacceptable Deal
Imagine the dilemma facing the directors of the company in knowing that by withdrawing the product from test users they would be taking away something that at least 5 extremely ill people in the 100 plus test group seemed to be benefiting from at that time.

Easy Decision to Take The Hard Road
Imagine a company that didn’t hesitate in making the decision to not only refuse a huge sum of money but to then decide to go down the difficult path of ‘NETWORK MARKETING’ to take the product to market. This because of the alternative of waiting several years for FDA approval (which might not have been given anyway due the products zero toxicity and therefore probably never being able to receive a LD50 Lethal Dose rating) before going to market was unacceptable.

Trillion dollar business
Imagine on the other hand being a player in the trillion dollar field of illness / disease or health / wellness and knowing that a competitor owns patents for something so significant that it might threaten the status quo and may one day affect your business model and perhaps reduce your industry to a minor participant.

You Can’t Stop People Talking
Imagine with all the money and lobbying power at your disposal that you just can’t stop people using a product and sharing their experiences with others. One way to pour doubt on something like this would be to hire people to go online and actively ‘lobby’ against the competitor wherever possible. Where better to do this than on blogs and forums that look impartial and have names like ‘science based medicine’ and where people might choose to ask for advice and when better to do it than when people are at their most doubtful – just when they start to research.<


When you visit these sites always make sure you go the bottom of the page because if there is any balance at all this is where you may find posts written by real users of the product attempting to defend it – often in the face of personal abuse. You might ask yourself why someone would face ridicule to defend something that didn’t work and why indeed someone would spend time and effort rubbishing something in which they had no vested interest.

Many bloggers and participants are professional or semi-professional (by that I mean that they are paid or receive some compensation or reward for their online efforts). They use the most current tools to receive notifications that a new post or inquiry has been posted and use direct email posting to respond. Also remember that anyone who knows how can create fake accounts to use to post mis-information and misleading statements.  It’s actually quite easy to have an online dialogue with yourself that looks like a conversation between two people.

Could it be that a lot of this aggressive campaigning against non-pharma products is sponsored by those who feel threatened by its growth and by peoples growing self awareness, education and empowerment? Otherwise who else has any reason to do this?

It’s true there are and always have been charlatans, snake oil, cons, rip-offs and lies out there but like anything that doesn’t have a basis in reality it will be investigated and exposed eventually for what it is. Nothing will last long if it actually is rubbish and doesn’t have any real measurable benefit.

Lastly – ask yourself why on earth why tens of thousands of people would spend their time and put their personal reputations on the line to support such an elaborate ‘scam’ – inventing personal experiences and then sharing these with family, friends and strangers – risking exposure and ridicule. One day someone may show us that we have all been hypnotised or indoctrinated into some wellness cult scam thing – in the meantime we may have to accept that the science of Redox Signalling is real, ASEA products are real , and that this company has demonstrably put people before profits. ASEA Associates are proud to be part of the future of this technology and will continue to offer help in the spirit of care and love to people who need it most and to all others.

Nicholas
February 2016
(BTW read my testimonial…)